Mr. Chair, what a claim.
Does the minister believe that the Supreme Court of Canada erred in Tsilhqot'in when it ruled that aboriginal title holders have a constitutional right to decide whether or not to give consent?
Since he does not appear to have read the rulings, I will remind him that in Tsilhqot'in, the Supreme Court refers to the notion of consent in nine paragraphs and even refers to the notion of control over resources and lands in 11 paragraphs.
Did the Supreme Court err in this ruling?