Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 68
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  No. This is the regular surveillance that we undertake to ensure that fish are not contaminated with either pathogens or chemicals. It's not related to the targeted study we did in 2019-20 for misrepresentation. That was a very focused study on a particular issue, versus our regular responsibility for monitoring the safety of fish that's eaten in Canada.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  I'm not surprised at all by Oceana's findings. They have done some very good work in terms of looking into this problem. As I mentioned earlier, we have to keep in mind the parameters of our study and the parameters of that done by Oceana. While the differences seem very stark, there are probably some differences in the way we did our studies and how we compared the results.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  The method of that falls within the area of sustainability and is not something the CFIA has an authority to do, but we do absolutely require origin to be indicated on products that are sold in Canada, and that falls within our mandate.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  Yes. While the boat-to-plate traceability item was not listed in the Minister of Health's latest mandate letter, it very much falls within CFIA's priority under the food policy and the funding we've received with respect to food fraud. We continue to undertake our work to prevent and detect fraud in Canada, which includes fish and seafood but also focuses on many other foods that are subject to fraud and misrepresentation in Canada.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  [Inaudible—Editor] and I certainly appreciate the challenge this poses to the members of the committee, and to average Canadians as well, in terms of understanding whether the food and fish they're eating are accurately labelled and, if they order something, if that is what they're getting.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  I can certainly speak to your question from the food safety perspective. We collaborate and engage with the food industry on a regular basis, even when we're not in consultation, whether it's on a policy or on regulations. We use industry input and feedback all the time. I'm not sure I can answer your question from the perspective of sustainability and environmental reasons, but from a health and safety perspective, the industry is very committed to ensuring it sells safe product.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  One of the requirements in the regulations is that every food processor or manufacturer have a preventative control plan. That plan also includes all the information related to how they're labelling their product. It is their responsibility under the law to make sure they can demonstrate that they are labelling their products truthfully and not in a misleading way.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  Our regular surveillance and verification activities demonstrate that there's a very high level of compliance. Fish has been regulated in Canada for quite a long time, even before the safe food for Canadians regulations came into being in 2019, and is probably one of the most stringently regulated of all the foods out there.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  I can speak from the food safety perspective. The United States, the EU and Canada all have very similar food safety traceability requirements. I understand that their work related to fish and seafood traceability specifically, and their programs for those, was done with the objective of sustainability and conservation under those mandates.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  We really work closely with all of our provincial and territorial colleagues, especially MAPAQ. The CFIA works closely with MAPAQ, which follows up within the province of Quebec to verify local establishments and works with the municipalities. Food safety has a multiple jurisdiction responsibility, and we work very closely with all levels to ensure that consumers are protected from end to end in the supply chain.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  Yes. That is correct.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  You are absolutely correct. Our focus, from a traceability perspective, is food safety and ensuring that when a food is prepared, manufactured, labelled, packaged and put up for trade in Canada, or imported or exported, it meets food safety requirements. That means it's prepared in conditions that are hygienic, that there is no risk of contamination, whether that be microbiological or chemical, that producers follow all the food safety rules that are laid out in our regulations and—

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  CFIA does extensive testing on fish products on an annual basis. We test approximately 4,000 samples every year for chemical and microbiological contaminants. We have a fairly robust surveillance program that tells us if fish are safe to eat in Canada.

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  The CFIA has a mandate for ensuring that food that is imported into Canada or food that's produced here is safe to eat. When it comes to catch practices or other issues that you mentioned, we don't have the mandate, but we are—

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha

Fisheries committee  I'm sorry. I'm not in a position to answer that question. I'm not—

February 10th, 2022Committee meeting

Tammy Switucha