Natural Resources committee  Okay.

Natural Resources committee  It meant that they couldn't poise them. It didn't mean that these couldn't fall in; they had some friction that was stopping it from being poised. It was a fail-safe situation.

Natural Resources committee  That's not a 25-words-or-less kind of answer. Sorry. There are many different scenarios. It depends on what your accident is.

Natural Resources committee  It's not what you want, for sure, but that's why there are three systems in MAPLE.

Natural Resources committee  Absolutely not.

Natural Resources committee  I agree with the multi-pronged approach. Don't cherry pick—give it buckshot.

Natural Resources committee  No, that's not what I said.

Natural Resources committee  No, it's 15 days to—

Natural Resources committee  As I said, I think we'd need a year to get the people back. I mean, it's not just putting the machine back; the people have to be re-certified to run it. You're looking at about a year for the timeframe.

Natural Resources committee  Yes. We could put in place any plans while the operators are being re-certified. That assumes that you can get them to come back to the project.

Natural Resources committee  Yes. There's some parallelism here. Some things can be done at the same time--

Natural Resources committee  --and two years, I think, is an outside--

Natural Resources committee  The regulator was present at almost every test we did. They were in the control room. There was no delay.

Natural Resources committee  It was in 2000. We started commissioning in February 2000, and the regulator was present for almost every test we did in the next two years.

Natural Resources committee  You have to do a safety case with the HANARO fuel. I don't see any impediment at the moment to sticking HANARO bundles in there. They're about ten centimetres longer than the MAPLE bundles. But you'd have to produce a safety case with that fuel.